首页 > 分享 > CO2浓度升高环境下9种杀虫剂对西花蓟马和花蓟马的毒力测定

CO2浓度升高环境下9种杀虫剂对西花蓟马和花蓟马的毒力测定

图  1   800 μL/L (a)和400 μL/L (b) CO2条件下9种杀虫剂对西花蓟马和花蓟马雌成虫的LC50值

注:FI. 氟虫腈,PH. 辛硫磷,AB. 阿维菌素,TH. 噻虫嗪,CA. 丁硫克百威,LAC. 高效氯氟氰菊酯,BI. 联苯菊酯,DE. 溴氰菊酯,CH. 氯虫苯甲酰胺;下同。

Figure  1.   LC50values of nine insecticides to Frankliniella occidentalis and F. intonsa of female adults under 800 μL/L (a) and 400 μL/L (b) CO2 condition

Note: FI. fipronil, PH. phoxim, AB. abamectin, TH. thiamethoxam, CA. carbosulfan, LAC. lambda-cyhalothrin, BI. bifenthrin, DE. deltamethrin, CH. chlorantraniliprole; the same as below.

图  2   800 μL/L (a)和400 μL/L (b) CO2条件下9种杀虫剂对西花蓟马和花蓟马雄成虫的LC50值

Figure  2.   LC50values of nine insecticides to F. occidentalis and F. intonsa of male adults under 800 μL/L (a) and 400 μL/L (b) CO2 condition

图  3   800 μL/L (a)和400 μL/L (b) CO2条件下9种杀虫剂对西花蓟马和花蓟马2龄若虫的LC50值

Figure  3.   LC50values of nine insecticides to F. occidentalis and F. intonsa of 2nd instar nymph under 800 μL/L (a) and 400 μL/L (b) CO2 condition

表  1   不同CO2体积分数下9种杀虫剂对西花蓟马和花蓟马雌成虫的毒力指标

Table  1   Toxicity indexes of nine insecticides to Frankliniella occidentalis and F. intonsa of famale adults under different CO2 volume fractions

杀虫剂
insecticide物种
speciesCO2体积分数/(μL·L−1)
CO2 volume fraction毒力回归方程
toxicity regression equation95%置信区间
95% confidence interval相关系数
correlation coefficientχ2
Chi-square氟虫腈
fipronil西花蓟马
F. occidentalis400y=4.934x+6.5180.428~0.5630.99980.0386800y=4.184x+6.6590.343~0.4620.99960.0472花蓟马
F. intonsa400 y=2.698x+5.9050.379~0.5820.99520.3249800y=3.224x+6.3500.318~0.4550.99540.4391辛硫磷
phoxim西花蓟马
F. occidentalis400y=3.516x−7.5054.216~5.9940.99480.5201800y=4.264x−7.9494.265~5.6760.98921.6129花蓟马
F. intonsa400y=3.133x−7.1624.077~6.0380.99990.0075800y=2.769x−6.5472.888~4.4260.99740.1813阿维菌素
abamectin西花蓟马
F. occidentalis400y=3.077x−8.72113.528~19.6480.98771.0757800y=3.368x−8.91912.313~17.3550.99680.3215花蓟马
F. intonsa400y=3.378x−8.96112.579~17.7211.00000.0016800y=3.066x−8.2108.997~13.3111.00000.0025噻虫嗪
thiamethoxam西花蓟马
F. occidentalis400y=3.069x−11.14383.550~121.1330.99030.8570800y=3.069x−10.99174.311~107.7200.99030.8570花蓟马
F. intonsa400y=2.800x−10.54978.805~118.2670.99110.6629800y=3.015x−10.64260.135~89.0100.99790.1721丁硫克百威
carbosulfan西花蓟马
F. occidentalis400y=2.269x−9.69091.665~156.1340.98320.7845800y=2.949x−10.80976.492~112.5360.98281.4510花蓟马
F. intonsa400y=2.789x−10.64386.171~132.2940.99600.2764800y=2.623x−10.07768.506~106.9750.99130.5588高效氯氟氰菊酯
lambda-cyhalothrin西花蓟马
F. occidentalis400y=3.069x−12.997335.340~486.0520.99980.0132800y=3.266x−13.332295.671~421.9120.99650.3409花蓟马
F. intonsa400y=3.213x−13.184294.952~421.2670.99710.2749800y=3.576x−13.946268.204~372.3120.99300.7967联苯菊酯
bifenthrin西花蓟马
F. occidentalis400y=3.224x−13.891477.660~681.8880.99540.4391800y=3.310x−13.974427.161~608.6610.99060.9501花蓟马
F. intonsa400y=3.531x−14.483410.941~571.3300.99230.8651800y=3.687x−14.664352.096~487.5400.99620.4417溴氰菊酯
deltamethrin西花蓟马
F. occidentalis400y=2.802x−13.345774.768~1160.9640.99940.0464800y=2.849x−13.367697.372~1046.3720.99440.4365花蓟马
F. intonsa400y=3.213x−14.525772.019~1103.0470.99400.5665800y=3.446x−14.980659.844~927.4550.99360.6834氯虫苯甲酰胺
chlorantraniliprole西花蓟马
F. occidentalis400y=3.775x−17.4021657.347~2305.5360.98152.0054800y=4.268x−18.4821248.441~1661.4951.00000.0060花蓟马
F. intonsa400y=2.672x−15.3291050.847~1606.6860.99740.1788800y=3.684x−15.993791.787~1128.6970.98591.4460

表  2   不同CO2体积分数下9种杀虫剂对西花蓟马和花蓟马雄成虫的毒力指标

Table  2   Toxicity indexes of nine insecticides to F. occidentalis and F. intonsa of male adults under different CO2 volume fractions

杀虫剂
insecticide物种
speciesCO2体积分数/(μL·L−1)
CO2 volume fraction毒力回归方程
toxicity regression equation95%置信区间
95% confidence interval相关系数
correlation coefficientχ2
Chi-square氟虫腈
fipronil西花蓟马
F. occidentalis400y=2.948x+6.0650.361~0.5320.99970.0279800y=3.160x+6.4930.276~0.4010.99920.0758花蓟马
F. intonsa400y=3.719x+6.5830.320~0.4390.99270.8944800y=3.794x+7.1980.224~0.3070.99270.9032辛硫磷
phoxim西花蓟马
F. occidentalis400y=2.673x−6.6693.425~5.2280.99480.3608800y=3.757x−7.0592.975~4.1370.99071.0830花蓟马
F. intonsa400y=3.622x−6.9292.846~4.0050.99130.9517800y=3.134x−6.3072.150~3.1150.99410.5379阿维菌素
abamectin西花蓟马
F. occidentalis400y=3.080x−8.44510.862~15.7481.00000.0001800y=3.666x−8.93910.019~13.8750.99330.7828花蓟马
F. intonsa400y=3.161x−8.49310.545~15.3400.99200.6104800y=3.736x−8.7558.452~11.8450.98681.5110噻虫嗪
thiamethoxam西花蓟马
F. occidentalis400y=2.816x−10.08851.962~77.8780.99600.3025800y=3.525x−11.22148.691~68.2800.99041.0589花蓟马
F. intonsa400y=3.213x−10.74651.468~73.5360.99400.5665800y=3.414x−10.74239.808~56.6140.99140.8923丁硫克百威
carbosulfan西花蓟马
F. occidentalis400y=2.916x−10.86984.703~127.5190.99800.1484800y=3.214x−11.26774.505~106.4060.99910.0877花蓟马
F. intonsa400y=2.758x−10.29067.400~103.3470.99740.1783800y=3.032x−10.56355.643~82.3710.99850.1173高效氯氟氰菊酯
lambda-cyhalothrin西花蓟马
F. occidentalis400y=3.213x−12.969252.816~361.1120.99710.2749800y=3.246x−12.922229.771~327.7310.98911.0732花蓟马
F. intonsa400y=2.797x−11.420161.312~241.6420.99380.4611800y=3.794x−13.516149.383~204.5440.99270.9032联苯菊酯
bifenthrin西花蓟马
F. occidentalis400y=3.123x−13.263365.063~528.5220.99000.9231800y=2.849x−12.509348.685~523.1850.99440.4365花蓟马
F. intonsa400y=3.123x−12.960292.051~422.8180.99000.9231800y=3.971x−15.115301.706~408.6680.99750.3266溴氰菊酯
deltamethrin西花蓟马
F. occidentalis400y=3.936x−11.261622.412~843.5520.99241.0059800y=3.927x−11.067559.809~763.3180.99201.0126花蓟马
F. intonsa400y=3.551x−15.090586.331~815.0430.99940.0673800y=3.927x−15.957524.821~715.6100.99201.0126氯虫苯甲酰胺
chlorantraniliprole西花蓟马
F. occidentalis400y=3.573x−15.795869.343~1230.9680.99120.9367800y=5.760x−17.241861.594~1112.8310.98010.2780花蓟马
F. intonsa400y=3.214x−14.629827.839~1182.2980.99910.0877800y=3.645x−15.699727.357~1007.3630.98961.2179

表  3   不同CO2体积分数下9种杀虫剂对西花蓟马和花蓟马2龄若虫的毒力指标

Table  3   Toxicity indexes of nine insecticides to F. occidentalis and F. intonsa of 2nd instar nymph under different CO2 volume fractions

杀虫剂
insecticide物种
speciesCO2体积分数/(μL·L−1)
CO2 volume fraction毒力回归方程
toxicity regression equation95%置信区间
95% confidence interval相关系数
correlation coefficientχ2
Chi-square氟虫腈
fipronil西花蓟马
F. occidentalis400y=2.822x+6.2530.291~0.4360.99870.1013800y=2.982x+6.7400.212~0.3130.99900.0816花蓟马
F. intonsa400y=3.087x+6.7040.232~0.3360.99240.6776800y=3.446x+7.2750.183~0.2580.99470.7459辛硫磷
phoxim西花蓟马
F. occidentalis400y=3.689x−7.1313.189~4.4460.99051.0829800y=3.906x−6.7122.327~3.2020.99041.1932花蓟马
F. intonsa400y=3.365x−6.5942.506~3.5300.99990.0128800y=3.134x−6.0591.792~2.5960.99410.5379阿维菌素
abamectin西花蓟马
F. occidentalis400y=3.214x−8.2008.278~11.8230.99910.0877800y=3.373x−8.3088.038~11.3220.99930.0708花蓟马
F. intonsa400y=2.810x−7.7257.574~11.3460.99200.6104800y=3.688x−8.3997.042~9.7510.99620.4417噻虫嗪
thiamethoxam西花蓟马
F. occidentalis400y=2.673x−9.69345.903~70.0720.99480.3608800y=3.439x−10.76039.140~55.6790.99490.5189花蓟马
F. intonsa400y=3.073x−10.18140.262~58.3450.99750.2182800y=3.927x−11.33934.989~47.7080.99201.0126丁硫克百威
carbosulfan西花蓟马
F. occidentalis400y=2.797x−10.49875.763~113.5410.99840.1213800y=3.310x−11.24764.074~91.2990.99060.9501花蓟马
F. intonsa400y=2.677x−10.02161.184~93.4550.99740.1783800y=3.405x−11.13853.256~74.9650.99820.1818高效氯氟氰菊酯
lambda-cyhalothrin西花蓟马
F. occidentalis400y=3.488x−13.049170.447~241.0030.99600.4091800y=3.403x−12.640145.838~208.4760.99150.8515花蓟马
F. intonsa400y=3.531x−12.01582.188~114.2660.99230.8651800y=3.794x−12.37474.691~102.2720.99270.9032联苯菊酯
bifenthrin西花蓟马
F. occidentalis400y=4.018x−15.481346.849~473.7210.99960.0462800y=3.757x−14.573297.462~413.6920.99071.0830花蓟马
F. intonsa400y=2.956x−12.210225.105~331.2720.98870.9519800y=3.310x−12.978213.581~304.3300.99060.9501溴氰菊酯
deltamethrin西花蓟马
F. occidentalis400y=3.315x−14.431583.005~835.8451.00000.0000800y=3.771x−15.500511.959~711.9080.99420.6783花蓟马
F. intonsa400y=3.366x−14.120432.284~609.1180.99890.1155800y=4.293x−16.473407.804~542.1610.99730.4027氯虫苯甲酰胺
chlorantraniliprole西花蓟马
F. occidentalis400y=3.414x−15.913663.456~943.5650.99140.8923800y=3.214x−14.223597.826~880.3280.99380.5609花蓟马
F. intonsa400y=2.805x−13.062607.371~910.6571.00000.0003800y=3.687x−15.417563.353~780.0640.99620.4417 [1] 戈峰. 应对全球气候变化的昆虫学研究[J]. 应用昆虫学报, 2011, 48(5): 1117. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-887X.2011.22.003. [2]

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Working group i contribution to the fifth assessment report of the IPCC[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.

[3]

REITZ S R, GAO Y L, KIRK W D J, et al. Invasion biology, ecology, and management of western flower thrips[J]. Annual Review of Entomology, 2020, 65(1): 17. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-ento-011019-024947.

[4]

KIRK W D J, TERRY L I. The spread of the western flower thrips Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande)[J]. Agricultural and Forest Entomology, 2003, 5(4): 301. DOI: 10.1046/j.1461-9563.2003.00192.x.

[5] 张友军, 吴青君, 徐宝云, 等. 危险性外来入侵生物: 西花蓟马在北京发生危害[J]. 植物保护, 2003, 29(4): 58. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0529-1542.2003.04.023. [6] 李鸿波. 高温对西花蓟马若虫存活及生殖的影响[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2021, 49(12): 52. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3601.2021.12.009. [7] 蒋兴川, 李志华, 曹志勇, 等. 蔬菜花期蓟马的种群动态与空间分布研究[J]. 应用昆虫学报, 2013, 50(6): 1628. DOI: 10.7679/j.issn.2095-1353.2013.224. [8]

ZHAO M F, HO H H, WU Y X, et al. Western flower thrips (Frankliniella occidentalis) transmits maize chlorotic mottle virus[J]. Journal of Phytopathology, 2014, 162(7/8): 532. DOI: 10.1111/jph.12217.

[9] 吕要斌, 张治军, 吴青君, 等. 外来入侵害虫西花蓟马防控技术研究与示范[J]. 应用昆虫学报, 2011, 48(3): 488. DOI: 10.7679/j.issn.2095-1353.2011.086. [10]

MOUDEN S, SARMIENTO K F, KLINKHAMER P G L, et al. Integrated pest management in western flower thrips: past, present and future[J]. Pest Management Science, 2017, 73(5): 813. DOI: 10.1002/ps.4531.

[11]

GAO Y L, LEI Z R, REITZ S R. Western flower thrips resistance to insecticides: detection, mechanisms and management strategies[J]. Pest Management Science, 2012, 68(8): 1111. DOI: 10.1002/ps.3305.

[12] 单彩慧, 王鸣华, 范加勤, 等. 西花蓟马防治药剂的室内筛选[J]. 农药, 2010, 49(10): 768. DOI: 10.16820/j.cnki.1006-0413.2010.10.022. [13] 付步礼, 唐良德, 邱海燕, 等. 黄胸蓟马高效低毒防治新型药剂的筛选[J]. 果树学报, 2016, 33(4): 473. DOI: 10.13925/j.cnki.gsxb.20150399. [14] 王宇飞, 孟焕文, 韩兵, 等. 不同杀虫剂对荞麦花蓟马的生物活性及作用机制[J]. 农药, 2020, 59(10): 770. DOI: 10.16820/j.cnki.1006-0413.2020.10.018. [15] 段盼, 杜飞, 胡昌雄, 等. 避雨栽培葡萄上蓟马发生动态及常用杀虫剂对优势种的毒力测定[J]. 植物保护, 2021, 47(1): 265. DOI: 10.16688/j.zwbh.2020197. [16] 包文学, 王春慧, 禇乌日罕, 等. 呼和浩特地区花蓟马对九种杀虫剂的敏感性研究[J]. 绿色科技, 2021, 23(13): 141. DOI: 10.16663/j.cnki.lskj.2021.13.051. [17] 董丽娜, 华登科, 郑晓斌, 等. 不同杀虫剂对烟蓟马的室内毒力与田间防效[J]. 植物保护, 2021, 47(2): 262. DOI: 10.16688/j.zwbh.2019617. [18]

SUN Y C, YIN J, CHEN F J, et al. How does atmospheric elevated CO2 affect crop pests and their natural enemies? Case histories from China[J]. Insect Science, 2011, 18(4): 393. DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-7917.2011.01434.x.

[19]

GUERENSTEIN P G, HILDEBRAND J G. Roles and effects of environmental carbon dioxide in insect life[J]. Annual Review of Entomology, 2008, 53(1): 161. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ento.53.103106.093402.

[20]

JONES R M. Toxicity of fumigant-CO2 mixtures to the red flour beetle[J]. Journal of Economic Entomology, 1938, 31(2): 298. DOI: 10.1093/jee/31.2.298.

[21]

FAN Z F, QIAN L, CHEN Y P, et al. Effects of elevated CO2 on activities of protective and detoxifying enzymes in Frankliniella occidentalis and Frankliniella intonsa under spinetoram stress[J]. Pest Management Science, 2022, 78(1): 274. DOI: 10.1002/ps.6630.

[22]

LEELAJA B C, RAJASHEKAR Y, REDDY P V, et al. Enhanced fumigant toxicity of allyl acetate to stored-product beetles in the presence of carbon dioxide[J]. Journal of Stored Products Research, 2007, 43(1): 45. DOI: 10.1016/j.jspr.2005.09.004.

[23] 郑晓旭. 高CO2浓度下褐飞虱体内共生菌与四种杀虫剂的相关性研究[D]. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2021. [24]

LIN Y Y, JIN T, ZENG L, et al. Insecticide toxicity to oriental fruit fly Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae) is influenced by environmental factors[J]. Journal of Economic Entomology, 2013, 106(1): 353. DOI: 10.1603/ec12103.

[25] 张晓明, 柳青, 李宜儒, 等. 六种常见杀虫剂对西花蓟马和花蓟马的毒力测定[J]. 环境昆虫学报, 2018, 40(1): 215. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-0858.2018.01.28. [26] 樊宗芳, 宋洁蕾, 桂富荣, 等. 5种杀虫剂对西花蓟马和花蓟马的毒力及其生理酶活性的影响[J]. 生物安全学报, 2021, 30(3): 206. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1787.2021.03.009. [27] 黄禹禹, 龚瑶, 许浩, 等. 4种杀虫剂对南亚实蝇各虫态不同日龄的毒力测定[J]. 环境昆虫学报, 2021, 43(6): 1557. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-0858.2021.06.26. [28] 张晓明, 胡昌雄, 赵浩旭, 等. 吡虫啉胁迫对西花蓟马生长发育及种群性比的影响[J]. 环境昆虫学报, 2017, 39(4): 870. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-0858.2017.04.18. [29] 张安盛, 张思聪, 李丽莉, 等. 3种环境友好型药剂对西花蓟马的室内毒力与田间防效[J]. 植物保护, 2012, 38(4): 175. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0529-1524.2012.04.039. [30] 付步礼, 曾东强, 刘奎, 等. 离心管药膜法测试12种杀虫剂对香蕉花蓟马的毒力[J]. 热带作物学报, 2014, 35(2): 344. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2014.02.023. [31] 唐良德, 付步礼, 邱海燕, 等. 豆大蓟马对12种杀虫剂的敏感性测定[J]. 热带作物学报, 2015, 36(3): 570. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2015.03.021. [32] 余海明, 魏方林, 朱国念. 三唑磷与氟虫腈复配对黏虫表皮的穿透作用[J]. 农药, 2010, 49(5): 344. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0413.2010.05.011. [33]

WANG Z P, LIU L, JIANG H T, et al. Field efficacy test of 22% fipronil FS against sugarcane stem borers and thrips[J]. Plant Diseases and Pests, 2016, 7(4): 23. DOI: 10.19579/j.cnki.plant-d.p.2016.04.007.

[34] 姜建军, 王凤英, 黄立飞, 等. 17种药剂对葡萄茶黄蓟马的室内毒力测定[J]. 中国南方果树, 2016, 45(1): 102. DOI: 10.13938/j.issn.1007-1431.20150099. [35]

BROUGHTON S, HERRON G A. Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande) (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) chemical control: insecticide efficacy associated with the three consecutive spray strategy[J]. Australian Journal of Entomology, 2007, 46(2): 140. DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-6055.2007.00568.x.

[36] 王健立, 郑长英. 8种杀虫剂对烟蓟马的室内毒力测定[J]. 青岛农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2010, 27(4): 300. DOI: 10.3969/jissn.1674-148x.2010.04.011. [37] 邵凡旭, 杨栋, 李红玉, 等. 六种药剂对棕榈蓟马的室内毒力及天敌敏感性测定[J]. 北方园艺, 2015, 39(17): 107. DOI: 10.11937/bfyy.201517028. [38]

SU J, GUO Y L, MA X G, et al. The comparison of drug resistance between western flower thrips (WFT) and Thrips tabaci[J]. Advanced Materials Research, 2012, 554/556: 1812. DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.554-556.1812.

相关知识

5种杀虫剂对设施辣椒西花蓟马的毒力及防效评价
3种生物测定方法对香蕉花蓟马毒力测定的影响
7种杀虫剂对茄子西花蓟马的防治效果
乙基多杀菌素胁迫对西花蓟马寄主适应性的影响
7种杀虫剂对禾花蓟马的室内毒力
磷化氢熏蒸对西花蓟马的毒力作用研究
防治西花蓟马药剂筛选试验
西花蓟马的抗药性及其治理策略
10种杀虫剂对苜蓿斑蚜和牛角花齿蓟马的毒力测定及田间药效评价
芒果蓟马的发生情况以及花蓟马的生物化学防控技术研究

网址: CO2浓度升高环境下9种杀虫剂对西花蓟马和花蓟马的毒力测定 https://m.huajiangbk.com/newsview1351973.html

所属分类:花卉
上一篇: 家用杀虫剂对防治蟑螂无效—新闻—
下一篇: 凯素灵®