图 1 2019-2021年降水量与气温
Figure 1. Precipitation and temperature in from 2019 to 2021
图 2 试验设计
CK、N1、N2、N3、N4分别表示施肥0、6、12、20、32 g·m−2,下同。
Figure 2. Experimental design
CK, N1, N2, N3, and N4 indicate fertilizer application of 0, 6, 12, 20, and 32 g·m–2, respectively. This is applicable for the following figures and tables as well.
图 3 不同年份对牧草营养成分的单因素方差分析
不同小写字母表示不同年份之间差异显著(P < 0.05),图5同。
Figure 3. One-way analysis of variance on forage nutrients in different years
Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among different years at the 0.05 level. This is applicable for Figure 5 as well.
图 4 不同施肥量对牧草营养成分的单因素方差分析
不同小写字母表示不同施肥处理之间差异显著(P < 0.05)。
Figure 4. One-way analysis of variance on plant forage nutrients with different fertilization amounts
Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among different fertilizer treatments at the 0.05 level.
图 5 不同年份对植物多样性单因素方差分析
Figure 5. One-way analysis of variance on plant diversity in different years
表 1 不同年份、施肥方式和施肥量对牧草中性洗涤纤维、酸性洗涤纤维、粗蛋白和相对饲用价值的方差分析(P值)
Table 1 Three-way analysis of different years, fertilization methods, and fertilization amounts on neutral detergent fiber, acidic detergent fiber, crude protein, and relative feed value of forage (P value)
变异来源表 2 不同年份、施肥方式和施肥量对植物多样性的三因素方差分析(P值)
Table 2 Three-factor variance analysis of plant diversity with different years, fertilizer methods, and fertilizer rate (P value)
变异来源表 3 氮肥添加后生物量占比变化
Table 3 Changes in biomass proportion after nitrogen fertilizer addition %
科YUAN M X, WEN Z S, HE L J, LI X X, ZHAO L. Response of temperate grassland phenology to climate change and its contribution to gross primary productivity in China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2024, 44(1): 354-376.
[2] 李娜, 唐士明, 郭建英, 田茹, 王姗, 胡冰, 罗永红, 徐柱文. 放牧对内蒙古草地植物群落特征影响的Meta分析. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(9): 1256-1269. doi: 10.17521/cjpe.2022.0341LI N, TANG S M, GUO J Y, TIAN R, WANG S, HU B, LUO Y H, XU Z W. Meta-analysis of effects of grazing on plant community properties in Nei Mongol grassland. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2023, 47(9): 1256-1269. doi: 10.17521/cjpe.2022.0341
[3] 任海燕, 田磊, 朱毅, 徐柱文, 曾德慧, 方运霆, 韩国栋. 氮水添加改变内蒙古典型草原两种优势植物的氮吸收偏好. 科学通报, 2022, 67(13): 1459-1468. doi: 10.1360/TB-2021-1202REN H Y, TIAN L, ZHU Y, XU Z W, ZENG D H, FANG Y T, HAN G D. Nitrogen and water addition alter nitrogen uptake preferences of two dominant plant species in a typical Inner Mongolian steppe. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2022, 67(13): 1459-1468. doi: 10.1360/TB-2021-1202
[4] 李静鹏, 郑志荣, 赵念席, 高玉葆. 刈割、围封、放牧三种利用方式下草原生态系统的多功能性与植物物种多样性之间的关系. 植物生态学报, 2016, 40(8): 735-747. doi: 10.17521/cjpe.2015.0457LI J P, ZHENG Z R, ZHAO N X, GAO Y B. Relationship between ecosystem multifuntionality and species diversity in grassland ecosystems under land-use types of clipping, enclosure and grazing. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2016, 40(8): 735-747. doi: 10.17521/cjpe.2015.0457
[5]DENG L, ZHANG Z N, SHANG Z P. Long-term fencing effects on plant diversity and soil properties in China. Soil and Tillage Research, 2014, 137: 7-15. doi: 10.1016/j.still.2013.11.002
[6] 张爽, 吕世杰, 丁莉君, 刘佳, 田野, 卫智军, 贾利娟. 羊草草甸草原群落多样性对打孔和施肥的响应. 中国草地学报, 2019, 41(4): 80-86.ZHANG S, LYU S J, DING L J, LIU J, TIAN Y, WEI Z J, JIA L J. Response of community diversity to drilling and fertilization in Leymus chinensis meadow grassland. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2019, 41(4): 80-86.
[7] 郭慧慧. 不同施肥对人工羊草地生产力及养分吸收影响的研究. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学硕士学位论文, 2016.GUO H H. Effect of different fertilizers on the productivity and nutrient accumulation of artificial Leymus chinensis meadow. Master Thesis. Yangling: Northwest A & F University, 2016.
[8] 车敦仁. 青海高寒牧区禾草施磷施氮的增产效应. 草业科学, 1990, 7(5): 15-20.CHE D R. Effects of phosphorus and nitrogen on grass yield in Qinghai alpine grassland. Pratacultural Science, 1990, 7(5): 15-20.
[9]PAN Q M, BAI Y F, HAN X G, YANG J C. Effects of nitrogen additions on a Leymus chinensis population in typical steppe of Inner Mongolia. Acta Phytoecological Sinica, 2005, 29(2): 311-317.
[10]LEBAUER D S, TRESEDER K K. Nitrogen limitation of net primary productivity in terrestrial ecosystems is globally distributed. Ecology, 2008, 89(2): 371-379. doi: 10.1890/06-2057.1
[11]DU E Z, TERRER C, PELLEGRINI A F A, AHLSTROM A, VAN LISSA C J, ZHAO X, XIA N, WU X H, JACKSON R B. Global patterns of terrestrial nitrogen and phosphorus limitation. Nature Geoscience, 2020, 13: 221-226. doi: 10.1038/s41561-019-0530-4
[12] 高宁. 刈割、施肥对高寒草甸物种多样性、功能多样性与生态系统多功能性关系的影响. 西安: 陕西师范大学硕士学位论文, 2020.GAO N. Effects of mowing and fertilization on species diversity, functional diversity and ecosystem function in alpine meadow. Master Thesis. Xi’an: Shaanxi Normal University, 2020.
[13] 张凤枰, 张芸, 张茹, 宋军, 孙延军, 杜亚欣, 宋涛, 张玮, 李斌, 李永亮, 张小超. 饲料中中性洗涤纤维(NDF)的测定 GB/T 20806-2022. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2022.ZHANG F P, ZHANG Y, ZHANG R, SONG J, SUN Y J, DU Y X, SONG T, ZHANG W, LI B, LI H L, ZHANG X C. Determination of Neutral Detergent Fiber (NDF) in Feeds GB/T 20806-2022. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2022.
[14] 杨发树, 宋军, 张凤枰, 杜亚欣, 宋涛. 饲料中酸性洗涤纤维的测定 NY/T 1459-2007. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2022.YANG F S, SONG J, ZHANG F P, DU Y X, SONG T. Determination of Acid Detergent Liber (ADF) in Feeds NY/T 1459-2007. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2022.
[15] 胡华锋, 介晓磊, 郭孝, 胡承孝, 严学兵, 王成章, 赵京. 基施硒肥对不同生育期紫花苜蓿营养含量及分配的影响. 草地学报, 2014, 22(4): 871-877.HU H F, JIE X L, GUO X, HU C X, YAN X B, WANG C Z, ZHAO J. Effects of Se application as basal fertilizer on the nutrient contents and distribution rates of alfalfa at different growth stages. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2014, 22(4): 871-877.
[16] 纪一帆, 吴宝镭, 丁玉华, 钦佩. 大丰野放麋鹿生境中芦苇和互花米草的营养对比分析. 生态学杂志, 2011, 30(10): 2240-2244.JI Y F, WU B L, DING Y H, QIN P. Nutritional components of Phragmites australis and Spartina alterniflora in Dafeng free-range David’s deer habitat of Jiangsu Province, East China: A comparative analysis. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2011, 30(10): 2240-2244.
[17] 徐鑫磊, 宋彦涛, 赵京东, 乌云娜. 施肥和刈割对呼伦贝尔草甸草原牧草品质的影响及其与植物多样性的关系. 草业学报, 2021, 30(7): 1-10.XU X L, SONG Y T, ZHAO J D, Wuyunna. Changes in forage quality and its relationship with plant diversity under fertilization and mowing in Hulun Buir meadow steppe. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(7): 1-10.
[18] 胡敏, 魏全全, 任涛, 周广生, 余陵峰, 鲁剑巍. 刈割后氮肥施用对饲料油菜地上部产量及品质的影响. 草业科学, 2017, 34(10): 2124-2129.HU M, WEI Q Q, REN T, ZHOU G S, YU L F, LU J W. Effect of nitrogen application on biomass yield and quality of forage rape after clipping. Pratacultural Science, 2017, 34(10): 2124-2129.
[19] 贾婷婷, 肖玉, 李天银, 刘军, 张月娥. 硫肥对河西走廊紫花苜蓿植株形状、产量及品质的影响. 草原与草坪, 2015, 35(3): 20-26.JIA T T, XIAO Y, LI T Y, LIU J, ZHANG Y E. Effect of sulfur fertilizer on biological characters, yield and quality of alfalfa in Hexi Corridor, Gansu. Grassland and Turf, 2015, 35(3): 20-26.
[20] 霍成君, 韩建国, 洪绂曾, 戎郁萍. 刈割期和留茬高度对混播草地产草量及品质的影响. 草地学报, 2001, 9(4): 257-264.HUO C J, HAN J G, HONG F Z, RONG Y P. Effect of the first clipping dates and different stubble height on the yield and quality of mixture pasture. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2001, 9(4): 257-264.
[21]DELEVATTI L M, CARDOSO A S, BARBERO R P, LEITE R G, ROMANZINI E P, RUGGIERI A C, REIS R A. Effect of nitrogen application rate on yield, forage quality, and animal performance in a tropical pasture. Scientific Reports, 2019, 9(1): 7596. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-44138-x
[22] 王桂良, 叶优良, 李欢欢, 朱云集. 施氮量对不同基因型小麦产量和干物质累积的影响. 麦类作物学报, 2010, 30(1): 116-122.WANG G L, YE Y L, LI H H, ZHU Y J. Effect of nitrogen fertilizer application on grain yield and dry matter accumulation for different genotypes of winter wheat. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2010, 30(1): 116-122.
[23] 马彦麟, 齐广平, 汪精海, 康燕霞, 史晓巍, 贾涪钧, 栗志. 西北荒漠灌区紫花苜蓿产量和营养品质对水肥调控的响应. 甘肃农业大学学报, 2018, 53(6): 171-179, 186.MA Y L, QI G P, WANG J H, KANG Y X, SHI X W, JIA F J, LI Z. Effects of water and fertilizer regulation on yield and nutritional quality of alfalfa grown in irrigated area in northwest desert zone. Journal of Gansu Agricultural University, 2018, 53(6): 171-179, 186.
[24] 何亚灵, 韦潇, 曾泰儒, 周冀琼, 凌瑶, 闫艳红. 氮肥水平对豆禾混播草地产量和营养品质的影响. 四川农业大学学报, 2022, 40(5): 721-745.HE Y L, WEI X, ZENG T R, ZHOU J Q, LING Y, YAN Y H. Effect of nitrogen fertilizer levles on yield and quality of legume-grass mixtures. Journal of Sichuan Agricultural University, 2022, 40(5): 721-745.
[25] 金晓明, 韩国栋. 放牧对草甸草原植物群落结构及多样性的影响. 草业科学, 2010, 27(4): 7-10.JIN X M, HAN G D. Effects of grazing intensity on species diversity and structure of meadow steppe community. Pratacultural Science, 2010, 27(4): 7-10.
[26]ZHANG R, HAO S, DONG S K, LI S, XIAO J N, ZHI Y L, Effects of 5-year nitrogen addition on species composition and diversity of an alpine steppe plant community on Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Plant, 2022, 11(7): 996.
[27]MOLOES A T, WARTON D I, WARMAN L, SWENSON N G, SHAWN W. Global patterns in plant height. Journal of Ecology, 2009, 97(5): 923-932. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2009.01526.x
[28]WAN Z Q, YAN Y L, CHEN Y L, GU R, CHEN Y, GAO Q Z. Ecological responses of Stipa steppe in Inner Mongolia to experimentally increased temperature and precipitation: Plant species diversity and sward characterisitcs. The Rangeland Journal, 2018, 40(2): 147.
相关知识
增温和氮素添加对内蒙古荒漠草原植物生殖物候的影响
不同恢复措施对内蒙古乌拉特中旗荒漠草原植物群落的影响
增温和氮素添加对内蒙古短花针茅流漠草原植物群落、土壤及生态系统碳交换的影响
土壤酸碱度调控对内蒙古草原植被群落及养分特征的影响
呼伦贝尔草原野生豆科牧草资源及植物生态地理区系分析
刈割对内蒙古草甸草原植物群落特征、土壤理化性质及温室气体通量的影响
物种多样性和功能群多样性与生态系统生产力的关系——以内蒙古短花针茅草原为例
围栏封育对温性草甸草原植物群落构成及生态位特征的影响
自然草甸对花卉混播群落建植的启示
不同菌剂添加量对牧草青贮料有机酸的影响
网址: 氮肥添加对内蒙古温带草甸草原牧草营养品质与群落结构的影响 https://m.huajiangbk.com/newsview1833722.html
上一篇: 几个多年生牧草品种引种试验总结 |
下一篇: [题目]为了探明我国西部干旱.半 |