摘要:
目的
研究不同黏合剂对花刺参(Stichopus monotuberculatus)吊笼养殖片状饲料稳定性、适口性和摄食行为的影响,以优选出适宜花刺参吊笼养殖片状饲料的黏合剂。
方法
在基础饲料中,以分别添加0.5%黄原胶、海藻酸钠、卡拉胶和木薯淀粉黏合剂制作成的片状饲料作为4个处理组饲料,以不添加黏合剂的基础饲料制作成的片状饲料为对照组饲料。比较不同黏合剂添加后片状饲料的保型能力和溶失率,以及不同片状饲料投喂后花刺参的累计运动路程、累计运动时间、累积停留时间和体质量变化。
结果
黄原胶和海藻酸钠均能显著提高片状饲料的保型能力,降低其溶失率(P<0.05);4个处理组的片状饲料均显著降低了花刺参的累积停留时间(P<0.05);卡拉胶组与木薯淀粉组的片状饲料显著增加了花刺参的累积运动路程(P<0.05);黄原胶组显著降低了花刺参的累积运动时间(P<0.05);实验结束后,海藻酸钠组花刺参体质量增长最大,黄原胶组的花刺参体质量增长最小。
结论
海藻酸钠提高了片状饲料的耐水性能,未明显改变花刺参的累积运动路程和运动时间,且其取得的生长效果最佳,因此宜选择海藻酸钠作为片状饲料黏合剂。
意义
本研究结果不仅为花刺参吊笼养殖片状饲料开发提供数据支撑,还可为花刺参养殖技术研究提供新的思路。
Abstract:
Background
Stichopus monotuberculatus, a tropical sea cucumber species, has attracted significant attention due to its high nutritional value and medicinal properties. However, to date, no studies have investigated the potential of suspension cage aquaculture for this species. Suspension cage farming is one of the most important methods in sea cucumber aquaculture, but its unique structural design often leads to feed loss, which can significantly impact the surrounding aquatic environment. This issue underscores the necessity of investigating innovative solutions to improve feed efficiency. For instance, studying the incorporation of binding agents into feed formulations to produce appropriately shaped sheet-like feed could play a crucial role in altering feed properties. Furthermore, understanding how such modifications influence the feeding behavior and movement patterns of S. monotuberculatus becomes essential for optimizing both the growth performance of the species and the sustainability of the suspension farming system.
Objective
The present study investigated the effects of different binders on the stability, palatability, and feeding behavior of sheet feed for the suspension cage aquaculture of S. monotuberculatus, in order to select the most suitable binder for sheet feed used in the cage farming of S. monotuberculatus.
Methods
In the basic feed, 0.5% xanthan gum, sodium alginate, carrageenan and cassava starch binder were added to make sheet feed as the experimental feed of the four treatment groups, and the basic feed without adding any binder to make sheet feed was used as the control feed. This study compared the binding performance (including type preservation ability and dissolution loss rate) of different binders, as well as their effects on the feeding behavior and growth of S. monotuberculatus.
Results
Both xanthan gum and sodium alginate could significantly improve the type preservation ability and reduce the dissolution loss rate of sheet feed (P<0.05). Both carrageenan and cassava starch improved the shape retention ability of flake feed and also reduced the dissolution loss rate of the feed, but there was no significant difference compared with the control. The cumulative residence time of S. monotuberculatus was significantly decreased by sheet feed in the four treatment groups (P<0.05). The sodium alginate group did not significantly change the cumulative exercise distance and cumulative exercise time of S. monotuberculatus. The cumulative exercise distance of S. monotuberculatus was significantly increased by the sheet feed of carrageenan group and cassava starch group (P<0.05). Xanthan gum group significantly decreased the cumulative exercise time of S. monotuberculatus (P<0.05). After the experiment, the body mass of S. monotuberculatus increased the most in sodium alginate group and the least in xanthan gum group.
Conclusion
Sodium alginate significantly enhanced the water resistance of sheet feed without markedly affecting the cumulative movement distance or duration of S. monotuberculatus. Notably, this treatment group demonstrated superior growth effect among all experimental groups. Therefore, sodium alginate was more suitable as the binder for sheet feed.
Significance
The results of this study not only provide data support for the development of sheet feed for hanging cage culture of S. monotuberculatus, but also provide a new idea for the research of breeding technology of S. monotuberculatus.
图 1 各组片状饲料跌落次数的比较
注:图中1、2、3、4和5分别表示对照组、海藻酸钠组、黄原胶组、卡拉胶组和木薯淀粉组;不同小写字母表示组间平均值差异显著(P<0.05),以下同此。
Figure 1. Comparison of sheet feed drop times among groups
Notes: 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 represent the control group, the alginate group, the xanthan gum group, the carrageenan group and the cassava starch group, respectively; different lowercase letters indicate significant differences in the average values among groups (P<0.05). It’s the same as figure 2-figure 5.
图 2 各组片状饲料2 h溶失率的比较
Figure 2. Comparison of 2-hour dissolution rate of sheet feed among groups
图 3 花刺参在片状饲料上累积停留时间的比较
Figure 3. Comparison of cumulative residence time of S. monotuberculatus on sheet feed
图 4 各组花刺参累积运动路程的比较
Figure 4. Comparison of cumulative movement distance of S. monotuberculatus among groups
图 5 各组花刺参累积运动时间的比较
Figure 5. Comparison of cumulative exercise time of S. monotuberculatus among groups
图 6 各组花刺参的体质量变化
Figure 6. Changes of body mass of S. monotuberculatus among groups
表 1 基础饲料配方
Table 1 Basic feed formula
组成 Composition比例/% Proportion 脱脂鱼粉 Skim fish meal5虾粉 Shrimp meal3扇贝粉 Scallop powder2发酵豆粕 Fermented soybean meal5海带 Sea mustard5裙带菜 Undaria pinnatifida10马尾藻 Sargassum fusiforme15鼠尾藻 Sargassum thunbergia15海泥 Sea mud40表 2 片状饲料制作相关参数
Table 2 Related parameters of sheet feed production
组别Wang H H, Yan J X, Feng Y Q, et al. Embryonic and larval development of sea cucumber Stichopus herrmanni[J]. Fisheries Science, 2017, 36(5): 606 − 611.
[2] 黄亮华,庞全坚,钟声平,等. 北部湾玉足海参和花刺参骨片结构与营养成分研究[J]. 广西科学,2020,27(5):578 − 584.Huang L H, Pang Q J, Zhong S P, et al. Study on morphological character of ossicles and nutrient composition of Holothuria leucospilota and Stichopus variegatus in the Beibu Gulf[J]. Guangxi Sciences, 2020, 27(5): 578 − 584.
[3]Zhao L Y, Wu M Y, Xiao C, et al. Discovery of an intrinsic tenase complex inhibitor: pure nonasaccharide from fucosylated glycosaminoglycan[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015, 112(27): 8284 − 8289.
[4] 马文刚,尹洪洋,孙春阳,等. 热带典型珊瑚岛礁海洋牧场花刺参底播增殖容量及其生态效应预测[J]. 海洋与湖沼,2022,53(6):1573 − 1584. DOI: 10.11693/hyhz20220400092Ma W G, Yin H Y, Sun C Y, et al. The ecological carrying capacity of Stichopus monotuberculatus and ecological effect prediction in a tropical coral reef island marine ranching area[J]. Oceanologia et Limnologia Sinica, 2022, 53(6): 1573 − 1584. DOI: 10.11693/hyhz20220400092
[5] 隋锡林. 刺参人工育苗及养殖技术的进步与展望[J]. 水产科学,2004,23(9):29 − 31. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-1111.2004.09.009Sui X L. The advancement and outlook of cultural breeding and aquatics technique of Apostichopus japonicus[J]. Fisheries Science, 2004, 23(9): 29 − 31. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-1111.2004.09.009
[6]Cheng C H, Wu F F, Ren C H, et al. Aquaculture of the tropical sea cucumber, Stichopus monotuberculatus: induced spawning, detailed records of gonadal and embryonic development, and improvements in larval breeding by digestive enzyme supply in diet[J]. Aquaculture, 2021, 540: 736690. DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2021.736690
[7] 刘常标,游岚. 福建省刺参养殖产业发展现状与对策[J]. 福建水产,2013,35(1):64 − 67. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5601.2013.01.011Liu C B, You L. Situation and countermeasure of sea cucumber culturing industry in Fujian Province[J]. Journal of Fujian Fisheries, 2013, 35(1): 64 − 67. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5601.2013.01.011
[8] 王卫民,纪玉娥,刘红蕾,等. 刺参浅海底播增殖技术研究[J]. 水产养殖,2012,33(3):25 − 26. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-2091.2012.03.011Wang W M, Ji Y E, Liu H L, et al. Study on breeding technology of Apostichopus japonicus in shallow sea[J]. Aquaculture, 2012, 33(3): 25 − 26. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-2091.2012.03.011
[9] 任利华,姜芳,张秀珍,等. 环境诱因引起大面积死亡背景下底播增殖仿刺参生物体优势菌分析[J]. 水产科学,2015,34(12):762 − 767.Ren L H, Jiang F, Zhang X Z, et al. Dominant bacteria in sea cucumber Apostichopus japonicus released in area where massive death was caused by environmental triggers[J]. Fisheries Science, 2015, 34(12): 762 − 767.
[10] 李成军,雷帅. 刺参吊笼养殖技术[J]. 现代农业,2016(8):13. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-0708.2016.08.007Li C J, Lei S. Suspending cage culture technology of Stichopus japonicus[J]. Modern Agriculture, 2016(8): 13. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-0708.2016.08.007
[11] 王兴春. 饲料对吊笼养殖仿刺参生长及体成分的影响[J]. 海洋渔业,2014,36(5):453 − 460. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-2490.2014.05.010Wang X C. Influence of different diets on growth and body composition of sea cucumber Apostichopus japonicus cultured in cages[J]. Marine Fisheries, 2014, 36(5): 453 − 460. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-2490.2014.05.010
[12] 肖瑶,王振洁,孙涛,等. 水产饲料粘合剂应用及展望[J]. 山东畜牧兽医,2016,37(5):56 − 57. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-1733.2016.05.039Xiao Y, Wang Z J, Sun T, et al. Application and prospect of aquatic feed binder[J]. Shandong Journal of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, 2016, 37(5): 56 − 57. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-1733.2016.05.039
[13] 刘峰. 大黄鱼和半滑舌鳎仔稚鱼人工微颗粒饲料蛋白源选择及其加工工艺相关研究[D]. 青岛:中国海洋大学,2007.Liu F. A study on protein soucres screen and processing-related technics in artificial microdiet for larvae of large yellow croaker (Pseudosciaena crocea) and tongue sole (Cynoglossus semilaevis)[D]. Qingdao: Ocean University of China, 2007.
[14]Argüello-Guevara W, Molina-Poveda C. Effect of binder type and concentration on prepared feed stability, feed ingestion and digestibility of Litopenaeus vannamei broodstock diets[J]. Aquaculture Nutrition, 2013, 19(4): 515 − 522. DOI: 10.1111/anu.12003
[15] 王吉桥,陈国泰,李振武,等. 三种黏合剂及其不同组合对仿刺参配合饵料水稳定性和消化率的影响[J]. 饲料博览,2007(2):5 − 9. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-0084.2007.02.001Wang J Q, Chen G T, Li Z W, et al. Effects of three binders and their combinations on water stability and digestive rate of the formulated diet for sea cucumber (Apostichopus japonicus)[J]. Feed Review, 2007(2): 5 − 9. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-0084.2007.02.001
[16] 孙硕. 重要环境因子对花刺参运动行为的影响[D]. 海口:海南大学,2020.Sun S. Effects of important environmental factors on the movement behavior of Stichopus herrmanni[D]. Haikou: Hainan University, 2020.
[17] 王宇. 鲍人工配合饲料水中稳定性和饲养效果观察[D]. 福州:福建农林大学,2015.Wang Y. The observations on water stability and feeding effect of artificial diet of abalone[D]. Fuzhou: Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, 2015.
[18] 冯其明. 仿刺参个体生长差异的行为及生理机制研究[D]. 青岛:中国科学院大学(中国科学院海洋研究所),2023.Feng Q M. Study on behavioral and physiological mechanism of individual growth differences of Apostichopus japonicus[D]. Qingdao: University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2023.
[19] 胡园,张涛,蔡景波,等. 养殖密度、水层、规格对浅海筏架吊笼养殖刺参生长的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报,2018,30(4):548 − 553. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2018.04.04Hu Y, Zhang T, Cai J B, et al. Effect of culture density, size and depth layer on growth of Apostichopus japonicas in shallow cages[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2018, 30(4): 548 − 553. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2018.04.04
[20] 姜小敏,蒋霞敏,罗斌,等. 管角螺配合饲料粘合剂的粘合性能研究[J]. 生态科学,2012,31(2):182 − 186. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-8873.2012.02.014Jiang X M, Jiang X M, Luo B, et al. Gumminess of bonding adhesives in formula feed of Hemifusus tuba (Gmelin)[J]. Ecological Science, 2012, 31(2): 182 − 186. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-8873.2012.02.014
[21] 陈笑冰,王小洁,麦康森,等. 添加不同种类的粘合剂对微颗粒饲料物理性状及大菱鲆稚鱼生长状况的影响[J]. 饲料工业,2011,32(10):6 − 10. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-991X.2011.10.002Chen X B, Wang X J, Mai K S, et al. Effects of different binders on physical properties of microdiets and growth status of larval turbot, Scophthalmus maximus[J]. Feed Industry, 2011, 32(10): 6 − 10. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-991X.2011.10.002
[22] 范鑫昊,孙明礼,周文礼. 仿刺参行为生态学及相关转录组学研究进展与展望[J]. 天津农学院学报,2022,29(4):75 − 85.Fan X H, Sun M L, Zhou W L. Research progress and prospect of behavioral ecology and related transcriptomics of sea cucumber[J]. Journal of Tianjin Agricultural University, 2022, 29(4): 75 − 85.
[23]Won S, Hamidoghli A, Lee J H, et al. Effects of three different dietary binders on juvenile sea cucumber, Apostichopus japonicus[J]. Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 2018, 18(7): 913 − 920.
[24] 赵鹏,杨红生,孙丽娜. 仿刺参(Apostichopus japonicus)摄食和运动器官的结构与功能[J]. 海洋通报,2013,32(2):178 − 183. DOI: 10.11840/j.issn.1001-6392.2013.02.009Zhao P, Yang H S, Sun L N. Study on the structures and functions of feeding and locomotor organs of sea cucumber Apostichopus japonicus[J]. Marine Science Bulletin, 2013, 32(2): 178 − 183. DOI: 10.11840/j.issn.1001-6392.2013.02.009
[25]Werner E E, Anholt B R. Ecological consequences of the trade-off between growth and mortality rates mediated by foraging activity[J]. The American Naturalist, 1993, 142(2): 242 − 272. DOI: 10.1086/285537
[26] 周宜敬,宋晨雨,杜凌翔,等. 饲料粘合剂对刺参循环水养殖水质、生长及肠道微生物的影响[J]. 渔业现代化,2024,51(4):14 − 26. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-9580.2024.04.002Zhou Y J, Song C Y, Du L X, et al. Effects of feed binder on water quality, growth and intestinal microbiota in recirculating aquaculture system of Apostichopus japonicas[J]. Fishery Modernization, 2024, 51(4): 14 − 26. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-9580.2024.04.002
[27] 李红兵. 海藻酸钠理化性质研究和特种品种制备[D]. 天津:天津大学,2005.Li H B. On the physicochemical properties of sodium alginate and preparation of its special specimens[D]. Tianjin: Tianjin University, 2005.
[28]Peso-Echarri P, Frontela-Saseta C, Santaella-Pascual M, et al. Sodium alginate as feed additive in cultured sea bream (Sparus aurata): does it modify the quality of the flesh?[J]. Food Chemistry, 2012, 135(2): 699 − 705. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.05.033
相关知识
光照对刺参(Apostichopus japonicus)苗种培育的影响及其机制的研究
复合免疫增强剂对刺参生长和非特异性免疫酶活性的影响
3种水质调控方式对刺参池塘浮游植物种群结构的影响
量化摄食行为,鱼群摄食图像分割方法
5种植物蛋白源替代鱼粉对花鲈生长性能和消化酶活性的影响
黄鳝养殖的五种常见饲料来源
刺参肠道组织结构及消化酶活性分析
光色、光照度和光周期对大菱鲆幼鱼生长和摄食的影响
草鱼对不同种类沉水植物的摄食研究
《摄食行为》
网址: 花刺参吊笼养殖片状饲料黏合剂优选及其对摄食行为的影响 https://m.huajiangbk.com/newsview2061749.html
上一篇: 水仙花什么季节开花 花期多长时间 |
下一篇: 苜蓿的弹花现象及花对传粉者觅食行 |