首页 > 分享 > 不同生物联合净化富营养化水体的效果

不同生物联合净化富营养化水体的效果

花匠小妙招
2024-11-08 09:09

摘要:利用野外原位围隔研究了鱼类、底栖动物和水生植物的不同组合对富营养化水体的净化效果。研究结果表明，鲴鱼（Plagiognathops microlepis Bleeker）能有效削减水体中TN，高锰酸盐指数和Chl-a，其中15 g·m-3投加密度的实验组高锰酸盐指数和Chl-a的削减率提高了8%，效果优于密度7.5 g·m-3的实验组，但不利于TP的去除；螺（Bellamya aeruginosa）和蚌（Hyriopsis cumingii）的投加对水体营养盐的去除有较好的效果，其中对Chl-a的影响最为显著（pWaterspinach）和水芹（Watersfennel）对水体中营养盐的去除差异不显著（p>0.05），蕹菜略好于水芹。本研究结果可为水生生态系统调控和修复提供科学依据。

关键词:围隔实验 / 鲴鱼 / 底栖动物 / 水生植物 / 净化

Abstract:Experiments were carried out under simulation conditions in outdoor mesocosms.The purification effect of different combinations of fishes, benthic animals, and aquatic plants on eutrophication was studied.The results showed that the fish Plagiognathops microlepis Bleeker reduced TN, permanganate, and Chl-a effectively.At a density of 15 g·m-3, the removal rates of permanganate and Chl-a were 8% higher than they were at a density of 7.5 g·m-3, but P.microlepis Bleeker was not conducive to TP removal efficiency.The benthic animals, Bellamya aeruginosa and Hyriopsis cumingii, apparently affected water nutrient removal, as the removal rate of Chl-a increased by 23.4% when B.aeruginosa and H.cumingii dosing occurred.The water nutrient removal difference between two kinds of aquatic plants, water spinach and water fennel, was not remarkable (p>0.05), although the effect of water spinach was slightly better than that of water fennel.This research provides a scientific basis for aquatic ecosystem regulation and repair.

[1]高世荣,潘力军.62Dm (大型水蚤)食藻虫生物株助力湖泊生态修复[C].上海:中国环境科学学会,2010:200-203 [2]马帅,王程丽,张亚捷,等.氮磷浓度对藻-溞-草间相互作用的影响[J].水生生物学报,2012,36(1):66-72 [3]闫玉华,钟成华,邓春光.非经典生物操纵修复富营养化的研究进展[J].安徽农业科学,2007,35(12):3459-3460 [4]CAO T,XIE P,NI L,et al. Carbon and nitrogen metabolism of an eutrophication tolerative macrophyte,Potamogetoncrispus, under NH4+ stress and low light availability[J]. Environmental and Experimental Botany,2009,66(1):74-78 [5]郑有坤,刘凯,熊子君,等.大水面放养水葫芦对富营养化湖泊水体可培养细菌群落结构的影响[J].微生物学通报,2015,42(1):42-53 [6]张振华,高岩,郭俊尧,等.富营养化水体治理的实践与思考——以滇池水生植物生态修复实践为例[J].生态与农村环境学报,2014,30(1):129-135 [7]江河,崔凯,胡王,等.优质环保型鱼类——细鳞斜颌鲴标准化养殖技术示范与推广[J].科技成果管理与研究,2014(7):86-87 [8]杜佳沐,张饮江,张磊,等.鱼贝植物组合对上海白莲泾生态修复效应研究[J].环境科学与技术,2010,33(5):6-11 [9]VÖRÖS L,OLDAL I,PRÉSING M,et al.Size-selective filtration and taxon-specific digestion of plankton algae by silver carp[J]. Hypophthalmichthysmolitri, 1996,342-343(1):223-228 [10]杨四秀.鲴鱼的生物学特性及养殖技术[J].内陆水产,2004,29(5):28-29 [11]张宁,季高华,王丽卿.滤食性鱼类鲢放养量对淀山湖水质影响的围隔试验[J].淡水渔业,2012,42(5):83-88 [12]王瑜.穗花狐尾藻、金鱼藻及圆顶珠蚌对白洋淀水质影响:围隔试验[D].保定:河北大学,2011:23-26 [13]卢子园.淀山湖鲢鳙放养对水质影响的围隔试验[D].上海:上海海洋大学,2010:45-49 [14]FRANK F,XU Y,XIA W. Protective effects of garlic (Allium sativum) and ginger (Zingiberofficinale) on physicochemical and microbial attributes of liquid smoked silver carp (Hypophthalmichthysmolitrix) wrapped in aluminium foil during chilled storage[J]. African Journal of Food Science,2014,8(1):1-8 [15]崔福义,林涛,马放,等.水体治理中鲢鳙生物操纵作用的实验研究[J].南京理工大学学报,2004,28(6):668-671 [16]戴学华,廉铁辉,李雪娇.鲢、鳙不同比例与密度放养对水质影响的原位围隔试验[J].海河水利,2012,(3):11-14 [17]刘晶,秦玉洁,丘焱伦,等.生物操纵理论与技术在富营养化湖泊治理中的应用[J].生态科学,2005,34(2):188-192 [18]储昭升,金相灿,庞燕.铜绿微囊藻和孟氏颤藻在富营养化湖泊中生长特征的模拟研究[J].环境科学学报,2006,26(11):1815-1820 [19]ALEXANDER E,Mc MAHON F.Respiratory response to temperature and hypoxia in the zebra mussel Dreissena polymorpha[J].Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A:Molecular & Integrative Physiology, 2004,137(2):425-434 [20]BAIRD I G,PHYLAVANH B,VONGSENESOUK B,et al.The ecology and conservation of the smallscale croaker Boesemania microlepis (Bleeker 1858-59) in the mainstream Mekong River, southern Laos[J].Natural History Bulletin of the Siam Society,2001,49:161-176 [21]李小龙,耿亚红,李夜光,等.从光合作用特性看铜绿微囊藻的竞争优势[J].武汉植物学研究,2006,24(3):225-230 [22]FRIEDLAND K D,AHRENHOLZ D W, HAAS L W.Viable gut passage of cyanobacteria through the filter-feeding fish Atlantic menhaden, Brevoortia tyrannus[J].Journal of Plankton Research, 2005,27(7):715-718 [23]宋海亮,吕锡武,李先宁,等.投放底栖动物强化水耕植物过滤法的净水效果[J].中国环境科学,2007,27(1):58-61 [24]STEWART T W,MINER J G,LOWE R L.An experimental analysis of crayfish (Orconectesrusticus) effects on a Dreissena-dominated benthic macroinvertebrate community in western Lake Erie[J].Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences,1998, 55(4):1043-1050 [25]向文英,王晓菲.不同水生动植物组合对富营养化水体的净化效应[J].水生生物学报,2012,36(4):792-797 [26]TANG X,HUANG S,SCHOLZ M,et al.Nutrient removal in pilot-scale constructed wetlands treating eutrophic river water:Assessment of plants intermittent artificial aeration and polyhedron hollow polypropylene balls[J].Water Air and Soil Pollution, 2011, 37(8):61-73 [27]陈倩,晁建颖,张毅敏,等.底栖动物与挺水植物协同修复富营养化水体的研究[J].水处理技术, 2011, 37(8):61-63 [28]李海英,李文朝,冯慕华,等.微曝气生态浮床水芹吸收N、P的特性及其对系统去除N、P贡献的研究[J].农业环境科学学报,2009,28(9):1908-1913 [29]李文祥,李为,林明利,等.浮床水蕹菜对养殖水体中营养物的去除效果研究[J].环境科学学报,2011,31(8):1671-1675

Created with Highcharts 5.0.7

访问量

Chart context menu

近一年内文章摘要浏览量、全文浏览量、PDF下载量统计信息摘要浏览量全文浏览量PDF下载量2023-122024-012024-022024-032024-042024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-110Highcharts.com

Created with Highcharts 5.0.7

Chart context menu

访问类别分布

DOWNLOAD: 6.7 %DOWNLOAD: 6.7 %FULLTEXT: 83.6 %FULLTEXT: 83.6 %META: 9.7 %META: 9.7 %DOWNLOADFULLTEXTMETAHighcharts.com

Created with Highcharts 5.0.7

Chart context menu

访问地区分布

其他: 86.2 %其他: 86.2 %Ashburn: 1.1 %Ashburn: 1.1 %Beijing: 4.5 %Beijing: 4.5 %Huozhou: 0.4 %Huozhou: 0.4 %Kunshan: 0.4 %Kunshan: 0.4 %Mountain View: 0.4 %Mountain View: 0.4 %Shijiazhuang: 0.7 %Shijiazhuang: 0.7 %Xingfeng: 1.5 %Xingfeng: 1.5 %XX: 2.6 %XX: 2.6 %Yuncheng: 0.4 %Yuncheng: 0.4 %南京: 0.4 %南京: 0.4 %济南: 0.4 %济南: 0.4 %深圳: 0.7 %深圳: 0.7 %赣州: 0.4 %赣州: 0.4 %其他AshburnBeijingHuozhouKunshanMountain ViewShijiazhuangXingfengXXYuncheng南京济南深圳赣州Highcharts.com