摘要: 选取密刺苦草Vallisneria denseserrulata,金鱼藻Ceratophyllum demersum,黑藻Hydrilla verticillata 和伊乐藻Elodea canadensis 4 种沉水植物构建了11 种组合,在室内条件下模拟富营养化水体环境,研究不同组合对富营养化水体的净化效果。结果表明,供试的沉水植物在富营养化水体中均能正常生长,不同组合对水体中污染物的去除效果均较明显。以C1(密刺苦草+金鱼藻+黑藻+伊乐藻)组合的植物长势最好,其最终净增生物量为3.89 g。不同沉水植物组合对水体中总氮(TN)、总磷(TP)的净化效果最好的是B4(密刺苦草+黑藻+伊乐藻)和C1,去除率分别为86.14%,83.52%和85.59%,81.26%。各沉水植物组合对铵态氮(NH4+-N)的去除率均在70%以上,其中以C1 和B1(密刺苦草+金鱼藻+黑藻)的净化效果最好,去除率分别为97.78%和96.89%。对水体中有机物(CODMn)去除效果最好的组合为C1 和B2(密刺苦草+金鱼藻+伊乐藻),去除率分别达89.63%和88.96%。综合分析表明,B4 和C1 的综合去污能力得分均在9 分以上,可作为最优植物组合应用于富营养化水体的净化。
关键词: 沉水植物 / 组合 / 富营养化 / 水质净化Abstract: Four common macrophytes including Vallisneria denseserrulata, Ceratophyllum demersum, Hydrilla verticillata and Elodea canadensis in Zhejiang province were selected for experiment during May 22nd and June 26th, 2019.They were treated for eleven combinations for purification test in simulated eutrophic water in lab.The results showed that the submerged plants grew normally in eutrophic water, and different combinations had obvious effect on the removal of pollutants in water.The combination of V.denseserrulata + C.demersum + H.verticillata + E.canadensis had the best growth, and the final increase in biomass was 3.89 g.Combinations of V.denseserrulata + C.demersum + E.Canadensis and V.denseserrulata + C.demersum + H.verticillata + E.Canadensis had the best purification effect on total nitrogen and total phosphorus with removal rate of 86.14%, 83.52% and 85.59%, 81.26%.The removal rate of NH4 +-N by each combination was more than70%.Among them, the combinations of V. denseserrulata + C.demersum + H.verticillata + E.canadensis and V.denseserrulata + C.demersum + H.verticillata had the best purification effect, the removal rates were 97.78% and 96.89%.The best combination of CODMn removal was the combinations of V.denseserrulata + C.demersum + H. verticillata + E.canadensis and V.denseserrulata + C.demersum + E.canadensis, with the removal rate of 89.63% and 88.96%.Comprehensive analysis demonstrated that the combinations V.denseserrulata + C.demersum + E.canadensis and V.denseserrulata + C.demersum + H.verticillata + E.canadensis had 9 points of removability, indicating the optimal plant combination for purification of eutrophic water.
[1] 尚佰晓,王莉,王爽,等.铁岭莲花湖水体富营养化评价[J].湿地科学,2014,12(1):97-101. [2] 吴雅丽,许海,杨桂军,等.太湖水体氮素污染状况研究进展[J].湖泊科学,2014,26(1):19-28. [3] 程刚.水体富营养化风险评价方法与案例分析——以香溪河为例[D].北京:中央民族大学,2012. [4] 戴汕,李庆卫.8 种植物对2 种质量浓度富营养化水体的净化效果[J].东北林业大学学报,2016,44(7):80-83. [5] 李冬林,王磊,丁晶晶,等.水生植物的生态功能和资源应用[J].湿地科学,2011,9(3):290-296. [6]DAI YR,JIA CR,LIANG W,et al.Effects of the submerged macrophyte Ceratophyllum demersum L.on restoration of a eutrophic waterbody and its optimal coverage [J].Ecological Engineering,2012,40(3):113-116.
[7] 毕业亮,吴诗敏,周思宁,等.绿狐尾藻对铜绿微囊藻和羊角月牙藻的抑藻效应 [J].环境科学,2019,40(5):2265-2270. [8] 孔祥龙,叶春,李春华,等.苦草对水-底泥-沉水植物系统中氮素迁移转化的影响[J].中国环境科学,2015,35(2):539-549. [9] 任文君,田在锋,宁国辉,等.4 种沉水植物对白洋淀富营养化水体净化效果的研究[J].生态环境,2011,20(2):345-352. [10] 刘丹丹,李正魁,叶忠香,等.伊乐藻和氮循环菌技术对太湖氮素吸收和反硝化的影响[J].环境科学,2014,35(10):3764-3768. [11] 李淑英,周元清,胡承,等.水生植物组合后根际微生物及水净化研究[J].环境科学与技术,2010,33(3):148-151. [12] 国家环境保护总局.水和废水监测分析方法[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,2002:24-56. [13] 陈江,金新华,周均,等.ICP-OES 测定废水中总磷[J].工业水处理,2011,31(7):83-85. [14] 姜北,孙美,纪玉琨,等.基于熵值法的地表水水质模糊综合评价[J].灌溉排水学报,2018,37(S1):47-50. [15] 邢丽贞,寇知辉,吴毅晖,等.对某城市污水处理厂技术性能的综合评价[J].中国给水排水,2017,33(03):87-92. [16]CHRISTIANSE N H,ANDERSEN F,JENSEN H S.Phosphate uptake kinetics for four species of submerged freshwater macrophytes measured by a33 P phosphate radioisotope technique [J].Aquatic Botany,2016,128:58-67.
[17] 金树权,周金波,包薇红,等.5 种沉水植物的氮、磷吸收和水质净化能力比较[J].环境科学,2017,38(1):156-161. [18]SACHSE R,PETZOLDT T,BLUMSTOCK M,et al.Extending one dimensional models for deep lakes to simulate the impact of submerged macrophytes on water quality [J].Environmental Modelling &Software,2014,61:410-423.
[19] 赵安娜,冯慕华,李文朝,等.沉水植物伊乐藻光合放氧对水体氮转化的影响[J].生态环境学报,2010,19(4):757-761. [20] 魏东慧,张江汀,魏学智.4 种水生植物对富营养化水体氮磷去除效果的研究[J].中国野生植物资源,2012,31(5):12-17. [21] 李慎瑰,赵以军,程凯.湿地植物根际微生物生物处理生活污水的模型规模研究[J].工业安全与环保,2009,35(8):9-10. [22] 彭婉婷,邹琳,段维波,等.多种湿地植物组合对污水中氮和磷的去除效果[J].环境科学学报,2012,32(03):612-617. [23] 胡智锋,陈爱民,裘知,等.模拟垂直潜流人工湿地中植物种类和植物多样性对脱氮效果的影响[J].环境污染与防治,2016,38(03): 45-49. [24]LAUGHLIN DC,HART SC,KAYE JP,et al.Evidence for indirect effects of plant diversity and composition on net nitrification [J].Plant and Soil,2010,330:435-445.
[25]SUTTON-GRIER A E,WRIGHT J P,MCGILL BM,et al.Environmental conditions influence the plant functional diversity effect on potential denitrification [J].PL o S One,2011,6(2):16584.
[26] 郭俊秀,许秋瑾,金相灿,等.不同磷质量浓度对穗花狐尾藻和轮叶黑藻生长的影响[J].环境科学学报,2009,29(1):118-123. [27] 潘保原,杨国亭,穆立蔷,等.3 种沉水植物去除水体中氮磷能力研究[J].植物研究,2015,35(1):141-145. [28] 索江瑞,宋辛辛,张莹莹,等.伊乐藻和黑藻生理生化特征及其竞争优势比较[J].湿地科学,2017,15(05):724-730. [29] 时志强,张运林,王明珠,等.长江中下游浅水湖泊水下辐照度漫射衰减特征研究[J].环境科学,2013,34(2):517-524. [30]OELMANN Y,WILCKE W,TEMPERTON VM.Soil and plant nitrogen pools as related to plant diversity in an experimental grassland [J].Soil Biology & Biochemistry,2007,71:720-729.
[31]PALMBORG C,SCHERER-LORENZEN M,JUMPPONEN A,et al.Inorganic soil nitrogen under grassland plant communities of different species composition and diversity [J].Oikos,2005,110:271-282.
[32] 刘淼,陈开宁.植物配置与进水碳氮比对沉水植物塘水质净化效果的影响[J].环境科学,2018,39(06):2706-2714. [33] 李欢,吴蔚,罗芳丽,等.4 种挺水植物、4 种沉水植物及其组合群落去除模拟富营养化水体中总氮和总磷的作用比较[J].湿地科学, 2016,14(02):163-172.相关知识
五种沉水植物对富营养化水体的净化效果
沉水植物对富营养化水体的净化作用及修复技术研究进展
水生观赏植物不同种植组合对富营养化水体的净化效果
沉水植物在富营养化水体原位生态修复中的功能
三种浮叶植物对富营养化水体净化效果研究
挺水植物对富营养化水体的净化效果研究
水生高等植物对富营养化水体净化作用的研究进展
宁夏4种水生植物对富营养化水体净化效果的研究
17种观赏植物对富营养化水体净化效果研究
冬季低温条件下浮床植物对富营养化水体的净化效果
网址: 多种沉水植物组合对富营养化水体的净化效果 https://m.huajiangbk.com/newsview418368.html
上一篇: 黑龙江省湿地生态环境监测指标的探 |
下一篇: 北京古树生态监测与评价 |